Someone just posted a YouTube video with the headline, ‘Children aren’t Children Any More”.

The problem with this is that they never were — or rather, every generation’s, or rather, every individual’s conception of child and adult (and whatever in-between stages they imagine) are a little different, though I suspect there’s a broader cultural conception composed of loosely compatible individual conceptions within specific societies, but that’s what shifts a little from generation to generation. So whatever this complainant’s conception is of childhood (and by implication adulthood), it wasn’t quite her parents’ conception and therefore probably not mine, and probably not yours. And her parents’ was not quite their parents’, and so on. Of course, it’s entirely possible that there is a vertical component in the transmission of the concept, so that different families will have different conceptions simultaneously.

One thing that is clear is that representing childhood, as in this video thumbnail, with stacked shelves in a toy store, would have been meaningless to much of the world a couple of generations ago, and to the entire world ten generations ago. Also that the same childhood might be a different thing from different perspectives; to one person this is your child and that usually has too many personal meanings to list. To another they’re a marketing mechanism, or a preaching opportunity, or a supply of labour, or of cannon fodder. The details change, but the last three? Children, sadly, are still the children they always were for those interested parties.

The Korg SQ‑64 has MOD outputs for non-pitch control voltages on Channels 1–3. In its internal menus they have a voltage range and a voltage offset, but the range is labelled by positive voltage, and this is confusing because it seems by default to produce either positive or negative. Values can be programmed in 0·5 steps from 0 to 127 (MIDI-equivalent), and low values produce a negative voltage. Confusing. The manual doesn’t say anything much about it, so I tested it (with an SQ‑64 with a factory-values reset) at +5 and +10 Volts nominal maximum. (Each channel’s nominal range can be stepped by 0·1V from 0 to +10V.)

The results are fairly linear, with the zero-point probably supposed to be at about 63. The description should probably be ±2·5 and ±5 Volts at these settings, with 0 representing 0V and the 127 representing the maximum set; but the offset can take it up to all-positive.

So, to use the range 0 to +5V you need to either offset a lower voltage (but the maximum offset is ±1V) or use a “+10V” range between values 63 to 127, which for some purposes I find isn’t really fine enough.

The figures in the Appendix are those measured for Channel 1. Channels 2 and 3 were almost identical. I don’t know if the outputs can be calibrated in the device either in software or hardware, and haven’t as yet measured multiple SQ‑64s. If I get different results from another I’ll update this post.

more →

Some graphics for democratic computing. The text is a line by Cory Doctorow. This page is a public draft, and may be altered or the contents moved to some other server in future.

Question from ALF, 2025-09-29 13:23:46

Hey! I'm ALF, from Italy. I found your great website looking for technical info about the KORG SD-400 Signal Delay. It works but the repetisiona are quite noisy (with some "air" blended with the original sound). I think it needs some fine tuning of the clock/bias. I opened it, founding 9 trimmers! I found the ones are responsible for the feedback amount. Could you provide me any schematics or give me any advice about this process? Many thanks in advance. Ciao for now! ALF

Response:

Unfortunately I don’t have any technical information about either the SD‑200 or SD‑400 apart from the user manuals (which aren’t very detailed). It took me about ten years after first getting one to find those! And since mine have been working I haven't tried adjusting any of the trimmers. I’ve been thinking of working out the circuit some day though.

I had this thought about gender-fluidity, which on consideration may illuminate the subject of gender more broadly.

Having met people who assert a variety of non-binary gender identities over the years, I’ve always been a little puzzled by the concept of fluidity, compared to gender as a reasonably constant thing. (In the absence of some major event requiring transition, though that’s more often a long-term mismatch rather than a specific event obvious to others.) I had no reason to disbelieve anyone, but I somehow didn’t get it.

I have considered that perhaps a very neutral position on the hypothetical feminine-to-masculine spectrum could produce a variable gender identity, if external influences could then overcome the neutral state. But that doesn’t clearly explain why there are people with fluid and people with consistently neutral identities. I also tend to think that masculinity-to-femininity as commonly practiced is not a single-dimensional spectrum, but rather a very approximate two-dimensional aggregate of characteristics which derive much of their imagined grouping from social influences anyway. However:

Perhaps We Flow

It occurred to me recently that another way of looking at it is that fluidity might be the norm. That is to say, that ordinary humans don’t necessarily have a real permanent sense of gender identity to begin with, rather than intermittent ones which are assumed and reified in between times. As someone once put it, ‘I don’t wake up every morning and immediately think oh-my-god-I’m-a-woman.’

more →

Some more notes about the Behringer 2600.

Clocks and Transients

A point which isn’t quite clear either here or in some of the pictures of the ARPs is what the function of the S&H external clock input is. But the later (orange) ARPs clarify that in the panel layout — the jack is an input to the S&H circuit, replacing the internal clock. Consequently it can be used to time the circuit separately while the internal clock is still triggering the transient generators.

Wondering what the actual transient times were, I connected up to an oscilloscope and found that the ADSR attack is surprisingly short in proportion to the other times. This remained the case at all time settings.

I measured the following maxima:

more →